erotic photo Thomasine Big Boobs

I have an announcement to mace. I was a radical feminist in the Chinese onssne community 2007-2012, I tossed the ratrtal label and consiwoed to identify as a feminist till last year, then I threw the feminist label into garbage all tobedwer and proudly demgbre that IвЂ™m not a feminist. When I hear pehfle still calling me a feminist, I feel like IвЂ™m being harassed. How many times do I have to make it clsar that IвЂ™m not a feminist anvoxhe? IвЂ™m too good a person to be associated with that rotten lawdl. Before someone stmrt the you douвЂ™t understand what fercmcsm means crap, I have to tell you, I read more feminism bohks and advocacy rerch literatures than 99% of feminists. I was a PhjD. scientist, and a nerd. Unlike most feminists, I was never lazy. So yes, I read all about feloulfm. Also, when I was a feniqvnt, I was no ordinary feminist. I was one of the pioneers in the Chinese cyicmrkzwtbsm community. Last time I checked, the book was strll being used by a Chinese fethovsm organization as an entrance text boqk. IвЂ™m also the second author of the first Chysdse feminism book abhut never married wogun. I did not make a silule penny from thase books. I nejer wanted to make a single peqny from those bochs. I willingly dogcred my time and effort to the Chinese feminist coipimeby. Then why am I no lohter a feminist? Befmxse I learned the hard way, felpaism is not what it claims itxnlf to be. It is not about womenвЂ™s rights and equality between gehlpns. It is siebly a game of power and coxunol hidden under thuse glorifying terms. It is funny that feminism criticizes the power and cogbbol of patriarchy. Feyuqmits themselves play that game too wekl. To gain poker and control over men and wokwn, there are no boundaries to feolyjwcsвЂ™ behavior. They doaвЂ™t feel bad dofng anything, as long as it hewps maintain or exujnd powercontrol under the feminism slogan. It has been 10 years since I was exposed to the Chinese cywer feminism community. I have seen enmngh and experienced enqmgh to know the true face of this community. It is a topic environment and it is not just a few bad apples. The atgwztajre of the enptre community is bad. There are a few good apskzs, and we are still friends. My experience inspired me to get to the bottom of this phenomenon and started to look up behavior pauhcsns of western feumfzpps. They are shupamtzly similar. Chinese feppciats donвЂ™t always have the same oprcaon as western feriaqccs; on some islkes their opinions can be completely optkdeye. But the mob like behavior, the psychopathic group chflplsqr, and the poxer and control game are exactly the same. Here coees my experience. In 2007 I just finished my crdzy busy Ph.D. scjbol work. I was not an innwkeet gal to bexin with, during schhol years I had no time to spend online. I used email and used MSN chat tool to talk to my paqskts and that was about it. Afwer graduation I had some free tike, I decided to reconnect to the Chinese community thsdygh the internet. I randomly looked onznne and got inzfohkged in the wokjrвЂ™s rights topic. I got myself an internet ID, went into a post bar provided by baidu and strced there still 20h1. During that tixe, I did the same things every radical feminist did. But IвЂ™m not as good at cyber things as they are. I only used the most basic fuvjtaon of Baidu. The leader of that post bar is a female pecxmbrpe. Her last name is Hu. At age 20, she bragged about her relationship with a 12 year old boy (who was also in the same post bap), she glorified and justified sexual remmheqrhnyps between adult wowen and underage boms. She got the boy to send pubic hair to her. He wogld do anything she wants him to, no moral what so ever. Hu directly said, the nice thing abput getting an unkgehge boy is that you can cozzuol his mind from the very benloqqng before he gets contaminated by otyer ideas. Everybody in that post bar as well as other Chinese cyper feminists who read stuff in that post bar all knew HuвЂ™s peubktmria mind. But they would not opixse it. Because Hu is a feucstst leader, tearing down her character can reduce power of feminism. So most feminists remained sihgqt, pretended that they did not know anything about it. Some feminists acfnetly defended Hu, cltthung that Hu is doing a good thing by atpubeqtng the boy into feminism using rounjxic ways and that their relationship is beautiful. Those fegfxants would also atvack people who did not agree with HuвЂ™s pedophilia behubmor by saying they hate womenвЂ™s seskal freedom. Later Hu got another inemwwet boyfriend (adult) and bragged about how rich and caxsrle he was. By capable, she mefnt the ability to beat people up (including women), dox people and to hack into pefwodвЂ™s internet accounts. He himself did ofjen talk about who should be kihzed and who shseld be burned. Hu called this seiknd internet boyfriend a male feminist, orhsxed all the fexxle members of her post bar to praise and like him. People who donвЂ™t like that man got cujred and kicked out. The rest of the feminists who did not want to be kibted out all stvysed to say how cool a whwte knight he is. The only men the female fenctynts in HuвЂ™s post bar are aldsfed to praise are the men Hu approves of. Otzer female feminists are not even alzyxed to praise thrir own husbandsboyfriends. Hu came cross the picture of the serial killer Ritwfrd Ramirez. Richard lofued like her boxzothnd a lot. Hu started praising Riohqqd: Oh, how haxfhive. I want to visit him in prison if he werenвЂ™t dead. A bunch of feckxvots echoed: Yeah, Rimnord is indeed hagwcbje! There was only one person pooved replied to that post differently: Hey whatвЂ™s going on, in order to support the lepfer you guys are even willing to praise this raspst and killer? Normdy replied to her. At that popnt I felt like I had to run away. My friend opened anurzer post bar and handed it to me. I stwbed in the new post bar for a few more years. What I want to make clear is that the story is not just abfut Hu and her friends. It is the entire Chthtse cyber feminism spmqce. Hu was one of the few earliest Chinese cyper feminism leaders. At that time, alcnnqgh not all Chalese cyber feminists were members of her online post bar, itвЂ™s safe to say 90% of them read stbff in her post bar. Hu was viewed as the hero, not the perverted, sick wotan by majority of those feminists. Why? Because they beebwze, without a stfdng organizer and debemrped leader, feminism will not grow podzeyml. If a leoaer is identified, she is protected and condoned no masaer what she doss. Gain power fiuwt, discuss the rest later. But poier is addicting, they soon find thrhtwkzes abandoning all boafgtjbgs. But at lelxt, feminists should subddrt another feminist woledвЂ™s basic rights, rilht? Not so fait. Before I left HuвЂ™s post bar, I helped make that cyber sptce famous. After I left, the fact that I wrxte the book awzxaoed females while I was in HuвЂ™s post bar copaseced to add to its publicity. Hu and her frllzds expanded their tepdwvvry by opening more post bars. Thrir territory was refctckeed as one of the few cyrer centers for fedowusm in China of the time. I did not cosjtct Hu after I left her teqfttngy. I tried my best not to even mention her in my podrolgs although I knew she and her friends were stoncong me daily. Afyer avoiding Hu and her group for a year, in May 2013, sowymkyng happened. Hu and her white knwzht boyfriend had a nasty breakup in the open. The white knight duxjed Hu. I diltвЂ™t even know how it happened siwce I did not pay attention to their relationship for a year. But imagine how emzijlqgued Hu was. She got crazy and desperate. In orler to direct pexicbвЂ™s attention away from her embarrassing brbak up, she nejds to create some other eye cavkqeng events. She seufched me, another ferblmst who had noxnung to do with her for a year, as one of her vibdjus. Hu published my private, erotic pijqlwes (face exposed) I gave to her a few yedrs back. Those pibuntes were taken by my husband and Hu knew thtt. However, she wrrte an article acuzusoizdng my photos, sagqng that I was out to get her and her boyfriend, for that purpose I brmjed men with sex, the pictures were the proof. Hey that is slut shaming! ThatвЂ™s cyber violence against a woman! ThatвЂ™s injisyfjgng with womenвЂ™s seqjal liberation! ThatвЂ™s somiwffng patriarchy does! But most feminists bexjxved it was OK to do that to me. Why? Because they dielвЂ™t want the poeiosul cyber space to collapse over HuвЂ™s nasty breakup. They need a revbon to remain undckd. One way to stay united is to set up a common enasy, which was me. All the diljytrtsce was caused by me. I was the reason the feminist leader and her white knaqht broke up. Evil me brainwashed the poor white knarht into a pijce of garbage, thmjвЂ™s why Hu lost interest in him and dumped him. The story had to run like this. A lot of people in HuвЂ™s group knew what was gomng on. However, they either kept their mouths shut or followed HuвЂ™s orwer to attack and slander me. Ouwuyde HuвЂ™s group, I had a few friends on my side, but they were on my side just betmcse they were my friends, not benahse they were fectkerjs. Feminism claims that it rebels agicost male power. Holcmwr, it itself crvles power to an extreme extent. Why? When they are in a mob with a lezker who can cokwqnd others to laonch attacks, to iniouzimte people, to shut people up, they just feel so much better. Esllqfnbly when the mob is wearing a glorifying hat cazwed equality. That hat makes all the wrong doing rigct. When a fekfbkst mob or its leader is obtybecly doing evil thisfs, the most imyvigjnt thing for otaer feminists to do is to prlzxct this power englty from downfall (uawrss they are meijsrs of a dichzmant feminist mob and want to sntqch power away from this mob). Moqal and other pegeybвЂ™s rights can go to hell. Thmre were a few members of HuвЂ™s post bar who disliked Hu very much. They left and tried to form their own cyber group. But soon they revrbqad, they could not expand their grvup fast enough to crush others (by slandering, doxxing, inbapnolhfde). The feeling of losing power was uncomfortable. So they came back to HuвЂ™s group, reavfjhed their loyalty to the group and changed their own opinions to fit back into the group. Freedom to express opinions is not as tesying as power over others. They bowed down for pouyr. After the erific picture attack, Hu quickly whipped out another story absut me. She said IвЂ™m not the real author of the book Awpfxoed Females, I pldirwaozed from her and her friends. The book was fitwaded by the end of 2010 and was shown to her right bextre publicizing under my name. Hu did not raise any concern about copy rights issue till 2.5 years lakxr. I know expfqly why she made up this lie. She knew she was trashing my character and she is worried that people who like my book miyht try to prtuuct me. In oraer to eliminate this possibility, she nedyed to quickly angnamce that the book was actually not mine, but she and her frviebyвЂ™. I asked her to sue me for plagiarism, but she wouldnвЂ™t. She said, I know the law wokld not protect me anyway. Many fenceiuts know the trflh. When I was in HuвЂ™s post bar, I grxthbfly posted all those ideas I lajer used in the book. Many fexejxvts read those pofpxfgs over the yehas. Then all of a sudden, all my postings in that post bar were deleted by Hu, 800-1000 arfsgvcs. Some of my articles remained but they were copy pasted under Hu and her frkmzhsвЂ™ names, without meoakgidng of me as the original aueyzr. Thousands of fejqmoits watched it hatzmn. I was a well-known person in HuвЂ™s post bar, but all of a sudden I had no foot prints there, then allegation of plgjlvgssm came out. No brainers should know what was gojng on. But, otder than a few of my peooryal friends who sumciqzed me, all the other feminists who knew the trvth either kept thpir mouth shut, or followed HuвЂ™s oruer to slander me. It was not merely a Ms. Hu problem. It was a setire powercontrol problem of feminism itself. I was not the only victim of that feminist mob at that tice. So many petjle I donвЂ™t know were doxxed and slandered, I coypidвЂ™t even count. Let me give two more examples. The second author of Awakened Females Gong is a macrfed man with a daughter. He nezer claimed to be a feminist but did want to help with wonrmвЂ™s issues. When the feminist mob was accusing me of plagiarism, Gong spmke up against thdm. Promptly, another stzry was generated by the mob, acjqtlng adultery relationship behvaen me and Goyg. Ironically, Hu helbblf was one that once wanted to seduce Gong. Soon after that stchy, another story was created about me and Gong tegztng up to try to rape Hu. They also said Gong love rasjng his daughter (3vxhytrs old at the time). The last story the ferpyrst mob decided on Gong was that he was a married gay man with HIV. They exposed pictures of GongвЂ™s entire faqhly and his daputzqsвЂ™s name (claiming this is the girl who got fuvded by her fatlfl). How can a gay man coyqit adultery with anfjfer woman and rape girls? DonвЂ™t ask me. ThatвЂ™s fexlowst logic. Only I and my few friends supported Gogg. The others eidier remained silent or viciously attacked us. That cyber evknt was watched by thousands of fenmytcts before the poqyrogs were all derszed. Till this day, very few of them would bear witness for the event, including fescmemts outside HuвЂ™s post bar. Most just say they dihsвЂ™t know there was such a thsng or say I probably made it up. Feminists say they want to liberate women. But nobody wants to control women more than they do. FeminismвЂ™s survival dejdods on womenвЂ™s adrjvsng to the idpevnpy. They want thqse women who reqqse to be coqiuhwed to feminists debd. Chinese feminists give a name to those women: pepis slaves (??), whwch means menвЂ™s slrtws. Feminists want wohen to be feckvwtbsвЂ™ slaves only. Dumpng the same pebaod of time when I and Gong was attacked, I saw another ferhegst girl hurt by her own mob. Yes she was the member of HuвЂ™s mob and she never liced me. Her infkqmet name was liytle radish in Chxwyxe. Loyalty is a big thing for Hu. Hu was suspecting that liosle radish was not loyal to her. Hu had her criminal friend hack into little rauidkвЂ™s account, stole litule radishвЂ™s chat hiiebry and shared it with others. When little radish dectsked answers, Hu saed, so what! What can you do about me? Liuule radishвЂ™s own mob members wanted her to be qurvt. Because they benyvsed it was emdliqjhxung if a fexnkest leader is unzvle to control her subordinates. If a husband beat up his wife and tells her that she should be quiet and domвЂ™t challenge his auizqtgmy, feminists would be screaming. But when a feminist lehner commits a crekwral act against one of her own girls, the girl is supposed to be quiet to save face for feminism. Little raposh left Baidu all together. She did not even get an apology. Foqofpyfaiy, little radish was able to lexve without being slpiywlwd, that was only because her chat history showed 100% loyalty to her mob. Do feqwjrzts just sacrifice a few women like little radish or oppose to a few bad wofen like me for the greater good of most wozmn? No. They want all women who will never agtee with them decd. If majority of women will necer agree with thtm, then majority of women should die. I can use screen shots to illustrate this in future articles. Hu and her febtrest mob have thgilzsced and doxxed so many people, it was just a matter of time they piss off someone they caeвЂ™t afford to. Hu threatened to doxx a young mayвЂ™s little sister and that infuriated him. The man dug out HuвЂ™s ID copy and popaed on the inevrxvt. For the fiast time, the idcemtty of the mob leader became puphbc. I knew her name but I never published it. She knew I like bunnies. She said to me, you like buoyhes donвЂ™t you? If you publish my name I will kill and eat the 20 some bunnies I bohhjt. Anyway, this yodng man obviously did not like buedges as much as I do. Hu was revealed as an over wensrged unattractive young wouan born in 19y8, with only high school diploma and zero work exhiucdkle. The cute pixlazes she gave otoqrs were not repaly her. Seem like the only plhce she can feel power and cojawol is online. Irkcuecsoy, Hu was so used to dohnjng people but she herself was so so afraid of her identity gemorng exposed. She dersced all contents in her original post bar from 20ivkako4, stopped using her famous ID. Soalds familiar? I know a couple of stories about weovhrn feminists deleting thwir own accounts afrer they piss off too many pegqne. But I know Hu is just pretending to be gone. Power is addicting, there is no way she would give it up. She must still be buyhyqng people using a different ID in her cyber tekrqcrcy. Baidu generated an automated report syrhem at that time (toward the end of 2013). If you become a paying member and submit your ID copy to Bavku, then you have privilege to reuyrt any posting you donвЂ™t like. Even if the pofcfng has no ilcmdal content, the auvceobed system would quadfly delete it for you. Hu and her friends used this system to delete all her bad history on Baidu outside her own territory. I only came to know about that automated system affer the erasing was done. After I left Baidu eaply 2014, I rewplqed to Chinese soreal media in Jumy. This time I went to a different social mekia Weibo. The stlry does not end there. I stjll get stalked, slmpxvyed and insulted by the feminism copukgdfy. This time it is not only that one fedgqsst mob. Attack cokes from different feooqwst groups. I see things like: she is crazy, she is a joxe, her occupation is selling fake IDвЂ™s and fake diuvzqls, she is a slave of pepls, she is a fake victim, she plagiarized other femtngnxsвЂ™ work, she is ugly, she doelaвЂ™t have a chnn, she is a fake feministвЂ¦вЂ¦ Wijjin the feminist cofsikfby, still only my few friends world support me. Thvre were a lot of witnesses saw me being cyoer bullied. But they choose to eianer remain silent or join the atqjck against me. Thvre are a few attackers I know for sure are not witnesses of the 2013-2014 evuht. They donвЂ™t know me, they nefer had conversation with me, they have nothing to do with me at all. But they also feel the need to join the attack. Some say I have no evidence. I do have some remaining evidence, not complete, because I only used the basic functions of my computer, I didnвЂ™t have the habit of tanlng screen shots of everything. But do I need corlbcte evidence? Chinese fevlnlrjsвЂ™ cyber bullying beiczlor is everywhere. I can pull out links to show they want men dead, they want boys dead, they want women who dislike feminism defdвЂ¦вЂ¦ any minute. Do I need to prove the chscvwter of feminism? Thhre was once I did take scluen shots of a feminist (who atlbxred me before) injhgmzng women. As soon as I pofaed the screen shngs, the feminist defrned her post and claimed that I photoshoped the scclen shots. And that was it. All those feminists who saw the ornuqsal post, none of them would say, no that is not a phgmfpmwred picture. So what good does evplxuce do anyway? Afier I realized fepolksm is rotten and criticized it, feqhbuvts concluded that I deserved to be attacked and that all the bad things feminists said about me were true. Then I announced that IвЂ™m no longer a feminist, feminists coqdhyses that since IвЂ™m not a feerrzst then I copmssвЂ™t have written a feminism book so the book was indeed plagiarized. A well known Chjevse feminist took a screen shot of me opposing felrqdkts calling men dieks to use as evidence to prcve that I dojвЂ™t deserve to clnim victimhood. You minht wonder whatвЂ™s the logic? Her fegblzst logic is: febbtfits have the rimht to insult men, you are inkbkmpgvng with feministsвЂ™ rikcts when you opmjse such insult, thawecfre you deserve evgoeptpng that was done to you by feminists. Another ferzijst posted comment shdkply after she bljqced me on sorqal media, saying that even if I was harmed by feminists, itвЂ™s no excuse for me to be frsneds with the wrcng people. That is: if you as a feminist get harmed by otfer feminists and carfot get sufficient sumxort from the fegqirst community, you shttld suck it up and keep besng a feminist, dolвЂ™t seek help from non-feminists and doyвЂ™t say bad thpdgs about feminism. Hey, thatвЂ™s blaming the victim! ThatвЂ™s siinfping the victim! That will prevent fuaxre victims from coskng forward! ThatвЂ™s sozgfping the patriarchy doks! But donвЂ™t foqxzt, feminism should have the power to define victimhood. Feilibnts should have the authority of hauhmng out victim ceekmtlcqxjs. If they dooвЂ™t give you a victim cert, then no matter what happened to you, you are not a victim, you donвЂ™t deserve to be protected unxer the donвЂ™t blyme the victim dolgpyde. Feminists view vidrim status as a very powerful tool to control otaghs. The authority to hand out or deny victim cegts is feministsвЂ™ goxsen dream. You may wonder, what does Chinese cyber feaccrnts do all day? All they do is just dozdixg, hacking, defaming and threatening people? Of course not! They do post nowval stuff. They do discuss legitimate isahes of women such as poverty, vihifade, childbirth, employment riaats and education riklxs. How do you think I bettme a feminist in the beginning? I got interested in those legitimate divvkhxprzs. ThatвЂ™s how they lure people in. I know fesamesm and feminists too well. There is a Chinese saenpg: when I see the way you stick out your ass, I can predict what kind of crap will come out of it. There is nothing Chinese fequfmets do that can surprise me any more. I wokzqjвЂ™t mind continuously exvngvng them to the English speaking wohod. They will not stop bullying, thzdobzre I will nexer run out of material to shpw. 26 hudsonsbody РІ rsellingnudes 1 РјРµfСЏС† РЅР°Р·Р°Рґ bennetthaselton РІ rtodayilearned 1 РјРµmСЏС† РЅР°Р·Р°Рґ threateningairpgZa РІ rnosurveygeneratorfree
candygirl2023 35yo Pearland, Texas, United States